My step-son is about to graduate high-school in June. He is
attending one of those private schools that sprang up like mushrooms in
Cambodia, although this one has been around a few years. When we enrolled him
there 2 years ago (after we had researched the background and interviewed the
principal) we thought he is on the way to a better education than what he would
get in a public school and would pave the way for a decent college education
and a good job here after that.
In fact, he has been getting a better education insofar as
they offer an English language curriculum; the Khmer classes are a sort of an
add-on. The main emphasis there is on that international program. He had not
been doing so great at the previous school (Zaman); he simply didn’t like it
there. Well, the change didn’t help much
either. He did like his school in the U. S., but mostly for its athletic
program. Academics is not his thing. Let’s just say he is not the best student.
Initially we also thought that he would graduate from a
school that would have an internationally recognized diploma. Fact is that
though the school had applied for international accreditation it obviously did
not pass muster as now they simply bestow an in-house diploma on their
students. Also, the sort of funny thing about this is that their 12th
grade students shrank from initially 8 down to 3, 2 Koreans and he. Most of the
more affluent parents had sent their children to Australia or the U. S. for
their high school diploma. After paying dearly for this quasi-education we will
be left with a diploma that is recognized only by a handful of Cambodian
institutions. If he were to go abroad he would have to take an additional high
school year and possibly graduation there to qualify for college
admission; this apart from being able to
show qualifying SAT or ACT scores, which have become the yardstick
internationally to prove one’s aptitude. I am sure many parents are faced with
the same dilemma. Your offspring is an average student at best and now we need
to search for something that both fits their abilities and, not the least, meets
with their enthusiasm. For most young people it is hard enough to choose the
right studies or profession. Most people change careers at least once, some
twice or even three times, and that includes me.
Aggravating this whole situation is the fact that Cambodia’s
job market does not really offer many opportunities for college graduates, not
to mention just high school graduates. A simple high school diploma is not
worth much in the West, so one can imagine what you can with a Cambodian diploma
here. After college, only the brightest
will find a decent paying job. They may
even get a scholarship abroad.
Here again we can see one of the most striking failures of
the government in the past decade. It has not invested in its education system.
The population growth is quite remarkable as most families still regard the
number of their children as a guarantee for their support when they have
retired. A huge 52 % are younger than 24; that includes 31% under 14. This is
the number of children that will be and
are in need of an education and the jobs
afterwards. An unqualified workforce does not attract qualified
investors, that is, investors that would bring more than garment processing
into the country. What we have seen is an emphasis on agriculture, which in
itself is an important sector for Cambodia. But huge tracts of land have been
granted to foreign, mostly Vietnamese, companies for rubber plantations. This
industry does not provide qualified jobs (I know about that; I own one, albeit
small). Is does not create added value to the economy either. Profits are
repatriated and the workforce is below minimum wage labor.
Tourism is the next largest foreign exchange earner and
provides about 20% of the jobs in the country. Again, this is minimum wage
labor for the most part and the workforce is mostly unskilled and needs to be
trained on the job. It is very hard to find halfway skilled employees in the
hotel and hospitality business. Lower and middle management is usually
recruited from expatriates, e. g. Filipino. The BA in tourism is not much to
speak of. Graduates hardly know anything about accounting or marketing their
product abroad. But they do know Angkor history.
All this leads me to believe that my initial estimate of a
generation (about 20 to 25 years) it would take Cambodia to catch up with its
Western neighbor needs to be recalculated.
After all, Thailand took about 30 years to raise itself from developing
country to a threshold economy. Judging from the progress this past decade
Cambodia, despite having made great strides in its overall development, will take
more than those 30 years to emulate their neighbors. Too much precious time is
lost in this most important field – education - for the future generations.
Coming back to my step-son;
considering this situation we are hard-put to point out the right
direction to him. I must admit that I personally misjudged the prospects in
Cambodia for younger people. We just may have to find a way to send him abroad
for studies that will give him the tools to make a decent living when he comes
back, if he then comes back at all.